Administrative Analyst SEIU (External Only)

BART
Oakland, California United States  View Map
Posted: May 06, 2025
  • Salary: $85,490.64 - $111,752.52 Annually USD
  • Full Time
  • Administrative Analysis and Research
  • Clerical and Administrative Support
  • Job Description

    Marketing Statement

    Ride BART to a satisfying career that lets you both: 1) make a difference to Bay Area residents, and 2) enjoy excellent pay, benefits, and employment stability. BART is looking for people who like to be challenged, work in a fast-paced environment, and have a passion for connecting riders to work, school and other places they need to go. BART offers a competitive salary, comprehensive health benefits, paid time off, and the CalPERS retirement program.

    Job Summary


    Pay Rate
    SEIU Professional Grade 08
    Hourly rate: $41.10 (Step 1) - $53.73 (Step 5)

    External candidates will start at Step 1


    Reports To
    Variable

    Current Assignment

    This announcement will be used to establish an eligibility list of qualified candidates within the System Safety Department.

    Administers and maintains Maximo Health and Safety Environmental (HSE) system safety database system and performs Safety Management System (SMS) data analysis in compliance with FTA and CPUC regulations.

    Participates in and implements future HSE expansion and enhancements and interfaces closely with the Office of CIO.

    Organizes various safety reports and forms and enters data into databases.

    Maintains safety training database.

    Assists in analyzing station exiting data using complex Excel functions

    Processes and logs Unusual Occurrence Reports (UOR) into database

    Schedules safety committee meetings and prepares meeting minutes.

    Assists in the publication of Operation Rules and Procedures (OR&P) and Operating Bulletins.

    Assists in revision of safety policies, procedures, and plans.

    Acts as department budget coordinator and processes purchase requisitions, Management Decision Documents (MDD), invoices, Go Card submittals, and other financial documentation.

    Maintains facility inspection deficiency/correction tracking records. Submits Request For Maintenance´s (RFM).

    Supports the Chief Safety Officer and System Safety staff as assigned.

    Prepares requests for maintenance (RFM) using information developed by staff conducting inspections of district facilities. Tracks RFMs to completion. Prepares periodic reports showing RFM status and aging.

    Enters information from reports received into District computer systems, prepares periodic reports showing incidents, trends, etc.

    Assists in the procurement of prescription safety glasses for employees. Monitors requests and ensures District requirements are met. Prepares periodic reports documenting who has received glasses and when they received them.


    Selection Process
    This is a SEIU Local 1021 Bargaining unit position. However, All SEIU members must follow the "Bid Form Process", failure to comply will invalidate an employee's application.

    The selection process will include a screening for minimum qualifications as listed in this posting and may additionally involve a skills/performance test, written exam, and/or a panel interview. Outside applicants will not be considered until all employees who have applied have been considered first.

    Application Process
    This is a SEIU Local 1021 Bargaining unit position. However, all full-time SEIU District employees must follow the "Bid Form" process and deposit their bids in the bid box. Failure to comply may invalidate the employee's bid. As actual vacancies occur, District employees on the internal eligibility list will be considered before outside candidates.

    External applicants may only apply on line, at www.bart.gov/jobs. Applicants needing assistance with the on line application process may receive additional information by calling (510) 464-6112.

    The Employment Office will screen Bid form applications and resumes against the minimum qualifications. Those candidates who meet the minimum qualifications will be referred to the hiring department for further consideration. The selection process may involve a skills/performance test, written exam, and/or a panel interview. Outside applicants will not be considered until all employees who have applied have been considered first.

    All applicants are asked to complete the application in full, indicating dates of employment, all positions held, hours worked, and a full description of duties. On line applicants are invited to electronically attach a resume to the application form to provide supplemental information, but should not consider the resume a substitute for the application form itself.

    Examples of Duties

    Plans and organizes administrative or management studies related to the activities or the operations of the department to which assigned.

    Determines analytical techniques and information gathering processes and obtains required information and data for analysis.

    Analyzes alternatives and makes recommendations regarding such areas as equipment, cost analysis, policy or procedure modifications, etc.

    Discusses findings with management staff and prepares reports of study conclusions.

    Assists in the development and implementation of department or division goals and objectives.

    Conducts a variety of special projects and programs related to the functions of the department or division to which assigned.

    Assists in preparing, analyzing and monitoring the annual budget, including gathering information for budget development and monitoring expenditures.

    Develops, implements and administers special administrative programs related to the functions of the department or division.

    Coordinates activities with those of other District departments, such as Employee Relations, Safety, and Purchasing depending upon the nature of the project to which assigned.

    Confers with representatives of other transit or governmental agencies, vendors and others, as required by project assignments.

    Provides technical assistance to others on administrative and analytical matters.

    May develop or utilize computer applications to assist with analytical studies.

    Prepares technical reports, correspondence and other written materials.

    Directs the work of support staff on a project or day-to-day basis.



    Minimum Qualifications

    Education :

    A Bachelor’s degree in business or public administration, accounting, economics, or a closely related field from an accredited college or university.

    Experience :

    Two (2) years of (full-time equivalent) verifiable professional level experience in administrative, management, systems, operations, budgetary or similar analyses.

    Other Requirements for the BPOA position only :

    Must pass a comprehensive background investigation, which will include fingerprinting and a polygraph inter/evaluation.

    Must be able to work various shifts, weekends, holidays and overtime.

    May require a valid California driver’s license and have a satisfactory driving record.

    Substitution :

    Additional analytical experience may be substituted for the education on a year-for-year basis. A college degree is preferred.

    Knowledge and Skills

    Knowledge of :
    • Principles, practices and methods of administrative and organizational analysis
    • Public administration principles and practices
    • Business computer user applications, particularly as related to statistical analysis and data management


    Skill in :
    • Analyzing difficult administrative, operational, and organizational problems
    • Evaluating alternatives and reaching sound conclusions
    • Collecting, evaluating and interpreting varied information and data, either in statistical or narrative form
    • Preparing, coordinating, administering and monitoring capital and operating budgets. Interpreting and applying laws, regulations, policies and procedures
    • Preparing clear, concise and complete reports and other written materials
    • Maintaining accurate records and files
    • Directing the work of others on a day-to-day or project basis
    • Coordinating multiple projects and meeting critical deadlines
    • Exercising sound independent judgment within established guidelines
    • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of the work



    Equal Employment Opportunity GroupBox1

    The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District is an equal opportunity employer. Applicants shall not be discriminated against because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age (40 and above), religion, national origin (including language use restrictions), disability (mental and physical, including HIV and AIDS), ancestry, marital status, military status, veteran status, medical condition (cancer/genetic characteristics and information), or any protected category prohibited by local, state or federal laws.

    The BART Human Resources Department will make reasonable efforts in the examination process to accommodate persons with disabilities or for religious reasons. Please advise the Human Resources Department of any special needs in advance of the examination by emailing at least 5 days before your examination date at employment@bart.gov .

    Qualified veterans may be eligible to obtain additional veteran's credit in the selection process for this recruitment (effective Jan. 1, 2013). To obtain the credit, veterans must attach to the application a DD214 discharge document or proof of disability and complete/submit the Veteran's Preference Application no later than the closing date of the posting. For more information about this credit please go to the Veteran's Preference Policy and Application link at www.bart.gov/jobs .

    The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) prides itself in offering best in class benefits packages to employees of the District. Currently, the following benefits may be available to employees in this job classification.

    Highlights
    • Medical Coverage (or $350/month if opted out)
    • Dental Coverage
    • Vision Insurance (Basic and Enhanced Plans Available)
    • Retirement Plan through the CA Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)
      • 2% @ 55 (Classic Members)
      • 2% @ 62 (PEPRA Members)
      • Reciprocity available for existing members of many other public retirement systems (see BART website and/or CalPERS website for details)
    • Money Purchase Pension Plan (in-lieu of participating in Social Security tax)
      • 6.65% employer contribution up to annual maximum of $1,868.65
    • Deferred Compensation & Roth 457
    • Sick Leave Accruals (12 days per year)
    • Vacation Accruals (3-6 weeks based on time worked w/ the District)
    • Holidays: 10 observed holidays and 3 floating holidays
    • Life Insurance w/ ability to obtain additional coverage
    • Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) Insurance
    • Survivor Benefits through BART
    • Short-Term Disability Insurance
    • Long-Term Disability Insurance
    • Flexible Spending Accounts: Health and Dependent Care
    • Commuter Benefits
    • Free BART Passes for BART employees and eligible family members.


    Closing Date/Time: 5/23/2025 11:59 PM Pacific
  • ABOUT THE COMPANY

    • BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit)
    • BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit)

    The BART story began in 1946. It began not by governmental fiat, but as a concept gradually evolving at informal gatherings of business and civic leaders on both sides of the San Francisco Bay. Facing a heavy post-war migration to the area and its consequent automobile boom, these people discussed ways of easing the mounting congestion that was clogging the bridges spanning the Bay. In 1947, a joint Army-Navy review Board concluded that another connecting link between San Francisco and Oakland would be needed in the years ahead to prevent intolerable congestion on the Bay Bridge. The link? An underwater tube devoted exclusively to high-speed electric trains.

    Since 1911, visionaries had periodically brought up this Jules Verne concept. But now, pressure for a traffic solution increased with the population. In 1951, the State Legislature created the 26-member San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Commission, comprised of representatives from each of the nine counties which touch the Bay. The Commission's charge was to study the Bay Area's long range transportation needs in the context of environmental problems and then recommend the best solution.

    The Commission advised, in its final report in 1957, that any transportation plan must be coordinated with the area's total plan for future development. Since no development plan existed, the Commission prepared one itself. The result of their thoroughness is a master plan which did much to bring about coordinated planning in the Bay Area, and which was adopted a decade later by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG).

    The BART Concept is Born
    The Commission's least-cost solution to traffic tie-ups was to recommend forming a five-county rapid transit district, whose mandate would be to build and operate a high-speed rapid rail network linking major commercial centers with suburban sub-centers.

    The Commission stated that, "If the Bay Area is to be preserved as a fine place to live and work, a regional rapid transit system is essential to prevent total dependence on automobiles and freeways."

    Thus was born the environmental concept underlying BART. Acting on the Commission's recommendations, in 1957, the Legislature formed the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, comprising the five counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo. At this time, the District was granted a taxing power of five cents per $100 of assessed valuation. It also had authority to levy property taxes to support a general obligation bond issue, if approved by District voters. The State Legislature lowered the requirement for voter approval from 66 percent to 60 percent.

    Between 1957 and 1962, engineering plans were developed for a system that would usher in a new era in rapid transit. Electric trains would run on grade-separated right-of-ways, reaching maximum speeds of 75-80 mph, averaging perhaps 45 mph, including station stops. Advanced transit cars, with sophisticated suspensions, braking and propulsion systems, and luxurious interiors, would be strong competition to "King Car " in the Bay Area. Stations would be pleasant, conveniently located, and striking architectural enhancements to their respective on-line communities.

    BART employees in the 1970s

    BART employees in the 1970s.

    Hundreds of meetings were held in the District communities to encourage local citizen participation in the development of routes and station locations. By midsummer, 1961, the final plan was submitted to the supervisors of the five District counties for approval. San Mateo County Supervisors were cool to the plan. Citing the high costs of a new system-plus adequate existing service from Southern Pacific commuter trains - they voted to withdraw their county from the District in December 1961.

    With the District-wide tax base thus weakened by the withdrawal of San Mateo County, Marin County was forced to withdraw in early 1962 because its marginal tax base could not adequately absorb its share of BART's projected cost. Another important factor in Marin's withdrawal was an engineering controversy over the feasibility of carrying trains across the Golden Gate Bridge.

    BART had started with a 16-member governing Board of Directors apportioned on county population size: four from Alameda and San Francisco Counties, three from Contra Costa and San Mateo, and two from Marin. When the District was reduced to three counties, the Board was reduced to 11 members: four from San Francisco and Alameda, and three from Contra Costa. Subsequently, in 1965, the District's enabling legislation was changed to apportion the BART Board with four Directors from each county, thus giving Contra Costa its fourth member on a 12-person Board. Two directors from each county, hence forth, were appointed by the County Board of Supervisors. The other two directors were appointed by committees of mayors of each county (with the exception of the City and County of San Francisco, whose sole mayor made these appointments).

    The five-county plan was quickly revised to a three-county plan emphasizing rapid transit between San Francisco and the East Bay cities and suburbs of Contra Costa and Alameda counties. The new plan, elaborately detailed and presented as the "BART Composite Report, " was approved by supervisors of the three counties in July 1962, and placed on the ballot for the following November general election.

    The plan required approval of 60 percent of the District's voters. It narrowly passed with a 61.2 percent vote District-wide, much to the surprise of many political experts who were confident it would fail. Indeed, one influential executive was reported to have said: "If I'd known the damn thing would have passed, I'd never have supported it. "

    The voters approved a $792 million bond issue to finance a 71.5 mile high-speed transit system, consisting of 33 stations serving 17 communities in the three counties. The proposal also included another needed transit project: rebuilding 3.5 miles of the San Francisco Municipal Railway. The new line would link muni streetcar lines directly with BART and Market Street stations, and four new Muni stations would be built.

    The additional cost of the transbay tube -- estimated at $133 million -- was to come from bonds issued by the California Toll Bridge Authority and secured by future Bay Area Bridge revenues. The additional cost of rolling stock, estimated at $71 million, was to be funded primarily from bonds issued against future operating revenues. Thus, the total cost of the system, as of 1962, was projected at $996 million. It would be the largest single public works project ever undertaken in the U.S. by the local citizenry.

    After the election, engineers immediately started work on the final system designs, only to be halted by a taxpayer's suit filed against the District a month later. The validity of the bond election, and the legality of the District itself, were challenged. While the court ruled in favor of the District on both counts, six months of litigation cost $12 million in construction delays. This would be the first of many delays from litigation and time-consuming negotiations involving 166 separate agreements reached with on-line cities, counties, and other special districts. The democratic processes of building a new transit system would prove to be major cost factors that, however necessary, were not foreseen.

     

    Show more

MORE JOBS

  • Administrative Legal Clerk - Entry

    • Auburn, California
    • PLACER COUNTY, CA
    • Mar 26, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Clerical and Administrative Support
    • Legal Services
  • Student Worker (IVC - A&R & Call Center)

    • Irvine, California
    • SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT (SOCCC)
    • Oct 18, 2024
    • Temporary
    • Clerical and Administrative Support
    • Customer Service
  • Police Officer - Trainee

    • Livermore, California
    • City of LIvermore
    • Jan 02, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Public Safety
  • Lecturer AY-SSED Teaching Supervisor

    • San Jose, California
    • Cal State University (CSU) San Jose
    • Apr 07, 2025
    • Administrative Analysis and Research
    • Clerical and Administrative Support
    • Education and Training
  • Administrative Specialist

    • Austin, Texas
    • City of Austin, TX
    • May 02, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Clerical and Administrative Support
  • Licensed Vocational Nurse

    • Contra Costa County, California
    • Contra Costa County, CA
    • Aug 02, 2024
    • Full Time
    • Public Health
    • Other
Show More
Apply Now Please mention you found this employment opportunity on the CareersInGovernment.com Job Board.
Please mention you found this employment opportunity on the CareersInGovernment.com Job Board.