Train Control Foreworker

BART
Oakland, California United States  View Map
Posted: Aug 05, 2025
  • Salary: $95,823.94 - $125,260.30 Annually USD
  • Full Time
  • Other
  • Job Description

    Marketing Statement

    Ride BART to a satisfying career that lets you both: 1) make a difference to Bay Area residents, and 2) enjoy excellent pay, benefits, and employment stability. BART is looking for people who like to be challenged, work in a fast-paced environment, and have a passion for connecting riders to work, school and other places they need to go. BART offers a competitive salary, comprehensive health benefits, paid time off, and the CalPERS retirement program.

    Job Summary

    Pay Rate
    SEIU FP Maintenance Grade 825
    Step 76: $46.07/hour - Step 99: $60.22/hour

    DEFINITION
    Under general supervision, plans, directs and reviews the work of a shift of train control electronic technicians engaged in the maintenance, installation, modification and primary repair of yard and train control equipment; provides for the instruction of staff in work and safety procedures; and performs related duties as assigned.

    CURRENT ASSIGNMENT

    This job posting will be used to fill two (2) current vacancies.

    The ideal candidate for the Train Control Foreworker assignment will be a skilled leader with strong technical knowledge of train control systems and proven experience in directing maintenance crews. Under general supervision, the Train Control Foreworker is responsible for planning, directing, and reviewing the work of a shift of electronic technicians involved in the maintenance, installation, modification, and repair of train control and yard equipment. The role also includes instructing staff in safety and work procedures and ensuring high-quality, efficient operations.

    The most qualified candidates will be evaluated and selected by the Foreworker Evaluation Committee based on their:

    • Demonstrated technical knowledge in Train Control Maintenance

    • Proven ability to analyze problems and make sound decisions

    • Experience directing and leading a workforce

    • Strong verbal and written communication skills

    Candidates should be able to work effectively in a dynamic environment, ensuring safety, quality, and compliance with standards across all assigned responsibilities.

    REPORTS TO
    This position reports to the shift Section Manager of Systems Maintenance.

    Selection Process
    This is a SEIU Local 1021 Bargaining unit position. The selection process will follow procedures pursuant to the Foreperson Evaluation Committee process specified in the SEIU Local 790 contract. The Employment Office will screen bids/applications/resumes against the minimum qualifications. Those candidates who meet the minimum qualifications will be referred to the hiring department for further consideration. The selection process may involve a skills/performance test, written exam, and/or a panel interview. Outside applicants will not be considered until all employees who have applied have been considered first. All applicants are asked to complete the application in full, indicating dates of employment, all positions held, hours worked, and a full description of duties. Online applicants are invited to electronically attach a resume to the application form to provide supplemental information, but should not consider the resume a substitute for the application form itself.

    Application Process
    All SEIU Local 1021 members MUST submit their bid forms in the bid box. Failure to comply may invalidate the employee's bid. Current Non-SEIU employees are strongly encouraged to apply online, either at www.bart.gov/jobs , or on WebBART. Current Non-SEIU employees may also apply using a BART paper application by delivering the completed form to the Human Resources Department, or by mailing it to P. O. Box 12688, Oakland, CA 94604-2688. Online or paper applications are considered to provide supplemental information and should not be considered a substitution for the bid form itself. Applications must be complete by the closing date and time listed on the job announcement.

    Examples of Duties

    Plans daily work schedules in accordance with assigned work list; assigns work to individuals and crews, and ensures that the work is done to accepted standards and within an established time frame.

    Assesses and adjusts priorities to ensure that yard and train control equipment does not impact revenue operations.

    Provides on-site supervision of crews.

    Assists/instructs employees in troubleshooting and planning complex repairs and maintenance.

    Assesses scope of unscheduled repair requests and assigns work; determines if the scope of repair requires completion by component repair shop and coordinates referral of equipment to the shop.

    Specifies and coordinates provisions of safe clearances and power shut offs required for work.

    Reviews and appraises performance of technicians, counsels employees and prepares documentation of deficiencies; resolves minor disputes and informs supervisors of disciplinary problems requiring action.

    Interprets District policies and procedures to employees.

    Arranges provisions of tools and equipment to employees in the field; ensures necessary parts, tools and supplies are available for completion of jobs.

    Orders/requisitions stock and special parts and equipment as needed and maintains inventory.

    Conducts safety meetings and discussions on assigned topics and shop issues; trains employees and monitors and enforces use of protective clothing, devices and safe work habits.

    Reads and interprets maintenance manuals, procedures, diagrams, engineering change orders and schematics.

    Arranges support of maintenance from other groups.

    Responds to computerized, telephone and in-person requests for train control and yard equipment maintenance.

    Maintains logs and records and prepares reports of work performed, labor hours and materials used, using current District maintenance management software and other current PC applications such as, excel, lotus notes, word, etc.

    Operates District vehicles to reach equipment to be serviced, and may include specialized highrail vehicles used on tracks; may operate cranes or other equipment as required for repair.

    Minimum Qualifications

    Education :
    An Associate degree in electronics from an accredited college, or a Certificate of Achievement in Electronics from an accredited college, or completion of military training in electronics, or completion of a formal apprenticeship as an electronic technician and possession of a high school diploma, GED, or recognized equivalent.

    Experience :
    Two (2) years of (full-time equivalent) verifiable experience in train control electronic and ancillary equipment repair which must have functioned in a supervisory or lead capacity for a minimum of six (6) months or must have completed a supervisory course at an accredited institution or its equivalent.

    Note: A minimum of three (3) years of BART experience is required.

    Other Requirements :
    Must possess a valid California driver's license and have a satisfactory driving record.
    Must possess adequate color vision to distinguish wiring, parts, and signals.
    Must be physically able to lift to waist level and carry up to 60 pounds.
    Must be physically able to climb, stoop, bend, kneel, and crawl to supervise and inspect the work of others.
    Must be physically able to walk on uneven surfaces for long distances.
    Must be physically able to work in confined spaces, underground and on aerial structures.
    Must be willing to work in exposure to live voltage.
    Must be able to wear respiratory protective equipment during the performance of assigned duties in accordance with the District Respirator Program and applicable Cal-OSHA requirements.
    Must be able to understand, read and communicate in English.
    Must be able to work various shifts, weekends, holidays, and overtime.

    Substitution :
    In addition to the experience listed above, four (4) years of (full-time equivalent) verifiable electronic maintenance experience (i.e. maintaining, troubleshooting and repairing electronic and/or electro-mechanical equipment) can be substituted for the education.

    Knowledge and Skills

    Knowledge of :
    • District Safety Rules, Standard Plans, Specifications, Rules, Regulations and Operations Procedures.
    • Basic operating principles of digital electronics and electro-mechanical mechanisms.
    • Methods, materials, tools and equipment used in preventive maintenance, installation, primary repair and modification of yard and train control equipment.
    • Basic supervisory principles including work assignment, instruction and review.
    • Procedures and equipment for diagnosing and troubleshooting yard and train control equipment problems.
    • Current District PC applications such as, excel, lotus notes, word, etc.
    • Mathematics used in train control maintenance including Boolean algebra.
    • Principles and practices of safety in equipment repair and maintenance.
    • Procedures for ordering and requisitioning parts, tools and supplies.

    Skill in :
    • Planning, assigning, directing and reviewing the work of train control electronic technicians.
    • Instructing assigned staff on work and safety procedures.
    • Analyzing train control equipment repair and maintenance problems, establishing scope of work required and recommending approach to the work.
    • Preparing and maintaining accurate records, logs and reports.
    • Using current PC applications systems.
    • Reading and interpreting manuals, diagrams and schematics.
    • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of the work.
    • Effectively handling priorities for train control equipment maintenance work.
    • Exercising sound independent judgment within general policy guidelines.
    • Leadership and organizational ability.
    • Operating the District’s radio and telephone communication systems in compliance with District Rules, Regulations and Procedures.


    Equal Employment Opportunity GroupBox1

    The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District is an equal opportunity employer. Applicants shall not be discriminated against because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age (40 and above), religion, national origin (including language use restrictions), disability (mental and physical, including HIV and AIDS), ancestry, marital status, military status, veteran status, medical condition (cancer/genetic characteristics and information), or any protected category prohibited by local, state or federal laws.

    The BART Human Resources Department will make reasonable efforts in the examination process to accommodate persons with disabilities or for religious reasons. Please advise the Human Resources Department of any special needs in advance of the examination by emailing at least 5 days before your examination date at employment@bart.gov .

    Qualified veterans may be eligible to obtain additional veteran's credit in the selection process for this recruitment (effective Jan. 1, 2013). To obtain the credit, veterans must attach to the application a DD214 discharge document or proof of disability and complete/submit the Veteran's Preference Application no later than the closing date of the posting. For more information about this credit please go to the Veteran's Preference Policy and Application link at www.bart.gov/jobs .

    The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) prides itself in offering best in class benefits packages to employees of the District. Currently, the following benefits may be available to employees in this job classification.

    Highlights
    • Medical Coverage (or $350/month if opted out)
    • Dental Coverage
    • Vision Insurance (Basic and Enhanced Plans Available)
    • Retirement Plan through the CA Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)
      • 2% @ 55 (Classic Members)
      • 2% @ 62 (PEPRA Members)
      • Reciprocity available for existing members of many other public retirement systems (see BART website and/or CalPERS website for details)
    • Money Purchase Pension Plan (in-lieu of participating in Social Security tax)
      • 6.65% employer contribution up to annual maximum of $1,868.65
    • Deferred Compensation & Roth 457
    • Sick Leave Accruals (12 days per year)
    • Vacation Accruals (3-6 weeks based on time worked w/ the District)
    • Holidays: 10 observed holidays and 3 floating holidays
    • Life Insurance w/ ability to obtain additional coverage
    • Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) Insurance
    • Survivor Benefits through BART
    • Short-Term Disability Insurance
    • Long-Term Disability Insurance
    • Flexible Spending Accounts: Health and Dependent Care
    • Commuter Benefits
    • Free BART Passes for BART employees and eligible family members.


    Closing Date/Time: 8/22/2025 11:59 PM Pacific
  • ABOUT THE COMPANY

    • BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit)
    • BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit)

    The BART story began in 1946. It began not by governmental fiat, but as a concept gradually evolving at informal gatherings of business and civic leaders on both sides of the San Francisco Bay. Facing a heavy post-war migration to the area and its consequent automobile boom, these people discussed ways of easing the mounting congestion that was clogging the bridges spanning the Bay. In 1947, a joint Army-Navy review Board concluded that another connecting link between San Francisco and Oakland would be needed in the years ahead to prevent intolerable congestion on the Bay Bridge. The link? An underwater tube devoted exclusively to high-speed electric trains.

    Since 1911, visionaries had periodically brought up this Jules Verne concept. But now, pressure for a traffic solution increased with the population. In 1951, the State Legislature created the 26-member San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Commission, comprised of representatives from each of the nine counties which touch the Bay. The Commission's charge was to study the Bay Area's long range transportation needs in the context of environmental problems and then recommend the best solution.

    The Commission advised, in its final report in 1957, that any transportation plan must be coordinated with the area's total plan for future development. Since no development plan existed, the Commission prepared one itself. The result of their thoroughness is a master plan which did much to bring about coordinated planning in the Bay Area, and which was adopted a decade later by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG).

    The BART Concept is Born
    The Commission's least-cost solution to traffic tie-ups was to recommend forming a five-county rapid transit district, whose mandate would be to build and operate a high-speed rapid rail network linking major commercial centers with suburban sub-centers.

    The Commission stated that, "If the Bay Area is to be preserved as a fine place to live and work, a regional rapid transit system is essential to prevent total dependence on automobiles and freeways."

    Thus was born the environmental concept underlying BART. Acting on the Commission's recommendations, in 1957, the Legislature formed the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, comprising the five counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo. At this time, the District was granted a taxing power of five cents per $100 of assessed valuation. It also had authority to levy property taxes to support a general obligation bond issue, if approved by District voters. The State Legislature lowered the requirement for voter approval from 66 percent to 60 percent.

    Between 1957 and 1962, engineering plans were developed for a system that would usher in a new era in rapid transit. Electric trains would run on grade-separated right-of-ways, reaching maximum speeds of 75-80 mph, averaging perhaps 45 mph, including station stops. Advanced transit cars, with sophisticated suspensions, braking and propulsion systems, and luxurious interiors, would be strong competition to "King Car " in the Bay Area. Stations would be pleasant, conveniently located, and striking architectural enhancements to their respective on-line communities.

    BART employees in the 1970s

    BART employees in the 1970s.

    Hundreds of meetings were held in the District communities to encourage local citizen participation in the development of routes and station locations. By midsummer, 1961, the final plan was submitted to the supervisors of the five District counties for approval. San Mateo County Supervisors were cool to the plan. Citing the high costs of a new system-plus adequate existing service from Southern Pacific commuter trains - they voted to withdraw their county from the District in December 1961.

    With the District-wide tax base thus weakened by the withdrawal of San Mateo County, Marin County was forced to withdraw in early 1962 because its marginal tax base could not adequately absorb its share of BART's projected cost. Another important factor in Marin's withdrawal was an engineering controversy over the feasibility of carrying trains across the Golden Gate Bridge.

    BART had started with a 16-member governing Board of Directors apportioned on county population size: four from Alameda and San Francisco Counties, three from Contra Costa and San Mateo, and two from Marin. When the District was reduced to three counties, the Board was reduced to 11 members: four from San Francisco and Alameda, and three from Contra Costa. Subsequently, in 1965, the District's enabling legislation was changed to apportion the BART Board with four Directors from each county, thus giving Contra Costa its fourth member on a 12-person Board. Two directors from each county, hence forth, were appointed by the County Board of Supervisors. The other two directors were appointed by committees of mayors of each county (with the exception of the City and County of San Francisco, whose sole mayor made these appointments).

    The five-county plan was quickly revised to a three-county plan emphasizing rapid transit between San Francisco and the East Bay cities and suburbs of Contra Costa and Alameda counties. The new plan, elaborately detailed and presented as the "BART Composite Report, " was approved by supervisors of the three counties in July 1962, and placed on the ballot for the following November general election.

    The plan required approval of 60 percent of the District's voters. It narrowly passed with a 61.2 percent vote District-wide, much to the surprise of many political experts who were confident it would fail. Indeed, one influential executive was reported to have said: "If I'd known the damn thing would have passed, I'd never have supported it. "

    The voters approved a $792 million bond issue to finance a 71.5 mile high-speed transit system, consisting of 33 stations serving 17 communities in the three counties. The proposal also included another needed transit project: rebuilding 3.5 miles of the San Francisco Municipal Railway. The new line would link muni streetcar lines directly with BART and Market Street stations, and four new Muni stations would be built.

    The additional cost of the transbay tube -- estimated at $133 million -- was to come from bonds issued by the California Toll Bridge Authority and secured by future Bay Area Bridge revenues. The additional cost of rolling stock, estimated at $71 million, was to be funded primarily from bonds issued against future operating revenues. Thus, the total cost of the system, as of 1962, was projected at $996 million. It would be the largest single public works project ever undertaken in the U.S. by the local citizenry.

    After the election, engineers immediately started work on the final system designs, only to be halted by a taxpayer's suit filed against the District a month later. The validity of the bond election, and the legality of the District itself, were challenged. While the court ruled in favor of the District on both counts, six months of litigation cost $12 million in construction delays. This would be the first of many delays from litigation and time-consuming negotiations involving 166 separate agreements reached with on-line cities, counties, and other special districts. The democratic processes of building a new transit system would prove to be major cost factors that, however necessary, were not foreseen.

     

    Show more

MORE JOBS

  • 25-26 AY Temporary Faculty Pool (Lecturer) - Geography

    • Fresno, California
    • Cal State University (CSU) Fresno
    • Mar 25, 2025
    • Education and Training
    • Parks and Recreation
    • Other
  • Assessment Technician

    • Hartford, Connecticut
    • CITY OF HARTFORD, CT
    • Apr 29, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Other
  • 25-26 AY Temporary Faculty Pool (Lecturer) - Theatre Arts

    • Fresno, California
    • Cal State University (CSU) Fresno
    • Mar 28, 2025
    • Education and Training
    • Museum and Arts
    • Parks and Recreation
    • Other
  • Job Developer/CSRI Victorville (UEC)

    • San Bernardino, California
    • California State University, San Bernardino (CSUSB)
    • Sep 23, 2024
    • Other
  • Asst/Assoc/ Professor - Family Medicine Hospitalist

    • Lubbock, Texas
    • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
    • Jun 05, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Other
  • Police Cadet

    • 1400 Fifth Avenue, San Rafael, California
    • City of San Rafael, CA
    • May 23, 2025
    • Part Time
    • Public Safety
Show More
Apply Now Please mention you found this employment opportunity on the CareersInGovernment.com Job Board.
Please mention you found this employment opportunity on the CareersInGovernment.com Job Board.